<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: All The News That&#8217;s Fit To Print</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.notaphoto.com/all-the-news-thats-fit-to-print/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.notaphoto.com/all-the-news-thats-fit-to-print</link>
	<description>Justin Edwards lives in Brisbane.  He has a camera.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adam Weathered</title>
		<link>http://www.notaphoto.com/all-the-news-thats-fit-to-print/comment-page-1#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Weathered</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 23:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notaphoto.com/?p=170#comment-173</guid>
		<description>I think that the opinions of people who attend gigs, read and contribute to street press on a regular basis (and aren't looking for controversy/look at me B.S.) are valid so people actually want to hear what you have to say on related issues...and it's probably a fair bit easier to generate comments/conversation from opinions (controversial or not) than it is from photos (no matter how good they are).  

PS. Did I spell controversy/controversial correctly?  Not a dumb joke...actually don't know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the opinions of people who attend gigs, read and contribute to street press on a regular basis (and aren&#8217;t looking for controversy/look at me B.S.) are valid so people actually want to hear what you have to say on related issues&#8230;and it&#8217;s probably a fair bit easier to generate comments/conversation from opinions (controversial or not) than it is from photos (no matter how good they are).  </p>
<p>PS. Did I spell controversy/controversial correctly?  Not a dumb joke&#8230;actually don&#8217;t know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
