<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Villains of Wilhelm + White Mansions @ UnderExposed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.notaphoto.com/villains-of-wilhelm-white-mansions-underexposed/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.notaphoto.com/villains-of-wilhelm-white-mansions-underexposed</link>
	<description>Justin Edwards lives in Brisbane.  He has a camera.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 04:07:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: That Was The Year That Was 2009 &#124; This Is Not A Photo Opportunity</title>
		<link>http://www.notaphoto.com/villains-of-wilhelm-white-mansions-underexposed/comment-page-1#comment-659</link>
		<dc:creator>That Was The Year That Was 2009 &#124; This Is Not A Photo Opportunity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 17:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notaphoto.com/?p=965#comment-659</guid>
		<description>[...] UnderExposed &#8211; 25 April [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] UnderExposed &#8211; 25 April [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brisbane Sounds 2009 on Film &#124; This Is Not A Photo Opportunity</title>
		<link>http://www.notaphoto.com/villains-of-wilhelm-white-mansions-underexposed/comment-page-1#comment-528</link>
		<dc:creator>Brisbane Sounds 2009 on Film &#124; This Is Not A Photo Opportunity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 02:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notaphoto.com/?p=965#comment-528</guid>
		<description>[...] in ID-11 developer.Â  The results are very grainy, as was expected, although slightly less than the photos from the middle Saturday at the UnderExposed when the film was rated at [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in ID-11 developer.Â  The results are very grainy, as was expected, although slightly less than the photos from the middle Saturday at the UnderExposed when the film was rated at [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.notaphoto.com/villains-of-wilhelm-white-mansions-underexposed/comment-page-1#comment-494</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 03:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notaphoto.com/?p=965#comment-494</guid>
		<description>I dunno that I&#039;m planning on doing /a lot/. But it&#039;s something I want to continue experimenting with. I think I might just be able to set up a darkroom in the laundry ... on the floor. Something to look into after the website finally goes live in a few weeks time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno that I&#8217;m planning on doing /a lot/. But it&#8217;s something I want to continue experimenting with. I think I might just be able to set up a darkroom in the laundry &#8230; on the floor. Something to look into after the website finally goes live in a few weeks time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.notaphoto.com/villains-of-wilhelm-white-mansions-underexposed/comment-page-1#comment-493</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 07:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notaphoto.com/?p=965#comment-493</guid>
		<description>Thanks Stephen.   

It&#039;s going to be really expensive to pay someone to develop and scan to disc if you&#039;re planning on doing a lot of b&amp;w photography.  If you are serious about it you should think about DIY developing.  Most of the fun is in the developing, it&#039;s a really special past time, very relaxing and therapeutic, a good way to spend a Sunday morning.  Set-up costs to get a processing tank, thermometer, couple of measuring cylinders, couple of cheap jugs, film canister opener, hanging clips etc were about $80 from memory. Chemicals on top of that (at least from memory I think the $80 was just the hardware) but it still works out pretty reasonable if you&#039;re doing do be doing it regularly.  I&#039;m extravagant/lazy so I just use stock developer and don&#039;t dilute so I could make it go a lot further if I wanted to.  Bought a negative scanner years ago, which at the time was really expensive at about $900 but I think you can get them a lot cheaper now and get them built into flat bed scanners.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Stephen.   </p>
<p>It&#8217;s going to be really expensive to pay someone to develop and scan to disc if you&#8217;re planning on doing a lot of b&amp;w photography.  If you are serious about it you should think about DIY developing.  Most of the fun is in the developing, it&#8217;s a really special past time, very relaxing and therapeutic, a good way to spend a Sunday morning.  Set-up costs to get a processing tank, thermometer, couple of measuring cylinders, couple of cheap jugs, film canister opener, hanging clips etc were about $80 from memory. Chemicals on top of that (at least from memory I think the $80 was just the hardware) but it still works out pretty reasonable if you&#8217;re doing do be doing it regularly.  I&#8217;m extravagant/lazy so I just use stock developer and don&#8217;t dilute so I could make it go a lot further if I wanted to.  Bought a negative scanner years ago, which at the time was really expensive at about $900 but I think you can get them a lot cheaper now and get them built into flat bed scanners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.notaphoto.com/villains-of-wilhelm-white-mansions-underexposed/comment-page-1#comment-489</link>
		<dc:creator>stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 00:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notaphoto.com/?p=965#comment-489</guid>
		<description>That first one is super. Dramatic. Powerful. Other adjectives like that.

I got my negs back today from Brisbane Sounds. Some of the shots look like they could be actually ok. Getting scans done now ... gosh it&#039;s all very expensive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That first one is super. Dramatic. Powerful. Other adjectives like that.</p>
<p>I got my negs back today from Brisbane Sounds. Some of the shots look like they could be actually ok. Getting scans done now &#8230; gosh it&#8217;s all very expensive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UnderExposed Closing Weekend Gigs &#124; This Is Not A Photo Opportunity</title>
		<link>http://www.notaphoto.com/villains-of-wilhelm-white-mansions-underexposed/comment-page-1#comment-486</link>
		<dc:creator>UnderExposed Closing Weekend Gigs &#124; This Is Not A Photo Opportunity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 07:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notaphoto.com/?p=965#comment-486</guid>
		<description>[...] Having taken a roll of film at the middle-weekend Saturday night UnderExposed gig, I decided to go back to digital for the last couple of gigs. Not sure why, as I had been delighted at the results of using and developing a roll of film for the first time in over three years; possibly because the previous week&#8217;s gig had had such terrible lighting and I thought I&#8217;d play around with my digital camera at much higher ISOs (although in the end the lighting was much better for these final two gigsÂ and I could keep the ISO speed at more sensible levels). The last weekend of gigs at the exhibition was bands from the poppier side of the musical spectrum, somewhere I guess I don&#8217;t go very often. Having never seen any of the bands playing before, I thoroughly enjoyed the two gigs and it was a great way to round of the exhibition. Roll on UnderExposed 2010. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Having taken a roll of film at the middle-weekend Saturday night UnderExposed gig, I decided to go back to digital for the last couple of gigs. Not sure why, as I had been delighted at the results of using and developing a roll of film for the first time in over three years; possibly because the previous week&#8217;s gig had had such terrible lighting and I thought I&#8217;d play around with my digital camera at much higher ISOs (although in the end the lighting was much better for these final two gigsÂ and I could keep the ISO speed at more sensible levels). The last weekend of gigs at the exhibition was bands from the poppier side of the musical spectrum, somewhere I guess I don&#8217;t go very often. Having never seen any of the bands playing before, I thoroughly enjoyed the two gigs and it was a great way to round of the exhibition. Roll on UnderExposed 2010. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
