I finally took the plunge and bought a new camera.Â I’ve had my Minolta 5D for 3Â¼ years and it always was my intention to look to upgrade after 3 years. Originally there was some talk that Sony’s recently released full-frame camera, the a900, would come in at under US$2,000 so I was waiting to see what happened with that. In the end it came in at about US$2,700, and the price hasn’t been helped by the weakening of the Australian Dollar in recent months, meaning that it I want to buy one now it’s in the AU$3,800 – AU$4,000 range.
There is a difference between being about to afford to buy a AU$4,000 camera and being able to justify spending that much and I just couldn’t justify the spend. If you spent $4,000 on a camera in the pre-digital days you would not only have ended up with an amazing camera, but one that would probably last the rest of your life (with a little bit of love and care and the odd bit of refurb). If you spend $4,000 on a DSLR you’ll more than likely be replacing it within 4 or 5 years. And on top of the cost of the actual camera you’ll probably have to buy a whole lot more memory cards to cope with theÂ larger, higher resolution files as well as computer upgrades for more RAM, more hard disk space, more back-up storage and possibly software upgrades to be compatible with the new camera firmware. Whilst digital has made it quicker and less messy, sometimes I’m not convinced if there are any real money savings to be had when compared against the good old days of using film and Sunday morning hangovers spent in the darkroom developing negatives.
So in the end I plumped for the Sony a700. Whilst it’s a year old model, and likely to be replaced during 2009, a recent firmware upgrade has by all accounts made it into a new camera and ultimately I was finding the limitations of a more than 3 year old camera increasingly frustrating, not to mention the recent issues with metering not working in some modes making it feel that it was on its last legs. A further advantage of a new digital camera is that it means that my second/spare camera isn’t a film camera now. I was always nervous when photographing big shows, and especially festivals, that my camera would suddenly die on me and I’d have to photograph with the film camera, which meant carrying around a load of film just in case. I regret not buying it a few months ago when the exchange rates made it more like $1,200, as opposed to the $1,500 I paid for it, but I expect this to keep me going for another few years.
Initial things I like about the a700
IQ looks to be infinitely better
Much larger range of ISOs available
ISO looks usable at much higher values than the Minolta 5D
Auto focus is much faster
LCD monitor is far superior
Flash Sync socket
Initial things I don’t like about the a700
Larger and heavier body
Although aluminium body, feels a bit plastic-y
Controls are laid out very differently
Shutter sound is quieter but doesn’t sound right
Autofocus sound is… different
Being such a big upgrade it all seems a bit complicated…
Takes different sized batteries (so more expense required)
So although there are a number of things that I’m not liking on first impressions, they’re generally the more cosmetic features and the differences that you might expect after having used the same camera for over 3 years.
I have taken it out and used it in anger for the first time since I listed those initial impressions and have been really impressed byÂ the image quality and ISO usability. It’s probably not going to be up there with the new Canon 5D mkII, but so far it’s looking more than good enough.Â Blog and photos are on their way.